Home Improvement, Remodeling and Repair @ Builders Websource. Home design software, advice, tools, videos, tech notes, links and more!

Search: 

Home Page | Books | BuildersTALK | Building a Dream | Green Building | Links | Software | Tech Notes | Tools | Contact

Messages and Online Forum Q&A

If you find the answer to this question useful, kindly CLICK TO PAY here.



Knowledge


BuildersTALK
Building|Dream
Green Building
How-To Books
Links (Web)
Newsletter
Tech Notes
Videos

Software


BeamChek
Bidding
CAD | AutoCAD
Estimating
EZHomeBuild
Home Design
Landscaping
Lighting Design
PrioSoft
Resi-Cost
Structural

Specialty Tools


CrackMON
Tools
WatrLevel

Support & Info


About Us
Advertise
Contact Us
FAQ
Publish
Services
Support

 

Re: Could someone explain "deadweight" v. "live load" roof deck l...

From: robert.barta@solipsys.com
Category: Decks
Remote Name: 209.117.190.11
Date: 19 Feb 2004
Time: 10:35 AM

Comments

My understanding is that the deadweight load for a deck should be higher than the live load. The live load is a moving entity and will exert more stress on the deck through that movement. Deadweight, such as planters and snow, is stationary and only exerts downforce on the deck. If your deck can hold 100 lbs/sq-ft live load, then it is very strong. In fact, the deck minimum is 40 lbs/sq-ft live load and most decks are built to 60 lbs/sq-ft. Sounds to me like you aren't getting the proper spec for the deadweight load. They even told you that a 16"x16" planter covers 1.75 sq-ft, when it really covers 2.25 sq-ft. You need to find someone who can give you the real loads on the deck before you can get some good advice.

 

Article Tools

BuildersTALK


Ask an Expert
Recent Questions
Click to Pay

Archives


2006-2007
Oct-Dec 2002
Jul-Sep 2002
Jan-Jun 2002
Jul-Dec 2001
Jan-Jun 2001
1999-2000

 

 


ASTM International